Thus the project sectarian political system, was «can the political Sunni» to find a strong opponent. Perhaps Saddam Hussein's war against Iran, Khomeini has reinforced the «Category», and divided the Arab Mashreq on the basis of sectarian, he considered the Shiites of Lebanon with Iraqi Shiites, with the Shiites of Bahrain and Kuwait, with Alloay Syria as if they were in one camp .. with this is not true absolutely, though it can be exploited in the conflict. Certainly the absence of Egypt, who did not know such a doctrinal conflict, and did not encourage him any day, but has been and continues to be a moderation in religion and combine «ritual» different .. this absence, has paved the way for the absence of political content, Vtbdy bright like on the verge of regaining chapters of the «Great sedition» .. Arbin became the Arabs, at least in the Orient .. Because Egypt is absent, as well as weighing up in the Arab Maghreb countries (Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia with them), it has exacerbated the sectarian conflict, was the absence of national and pan mosques. That was self-evident - especially that of a hard-line application for more Sunni sects puritanical Saudi Arabia, has advanced to the top of «Sunnis» of rivalry which is almost to be a runner and other Sunni doctrines, how Shiites, which facilitates accused by extension Iran. Site Became obvious, too, talk about the Shiite axis stretches from Iran to Iraq, Lebanon, where the Shiite presence and balanced, through Syria, which facilitates the stamp system as «Alawi» Thus it is closer to the Shiites ... then that Shiite Iran has rode in the war on Iraq, the Sunni as a whole, although the Shiites outnumber Sunnis.